Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan" Results 141 - 160 of 358
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm by Will Baude
But the more important, and first, Supreme Court reference to the "court of history" is in New York Times v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:42 am by Peter Mahler
The Korangy Case Korangy involves a member-managed New York LLC formed by its two 50% members, Amir Korangy and Georgia Malone, to acquire and operate a particular commercial property in Riverhead, New York. [read post]
6 May 2018, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
MacLennan (1908), the case that first recognized something like an "actual malice" test for speech about public officials, and that was later cited prominently for this proposition by New York Times Co. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Yet Massachusetts courts could also in principle revive the common-law crime just by redefining it consistently with New York Times Co. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Properly crafted anti-libel injunctions are often necessary If a plaintiff is libeled by the New York Times, damages might be a tolerable remedy. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 6:20 pm by Mark Graber
  The Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Reasonable readers must be taught that that the First Amendment allows us the “breathing space” to make such errors (See, New York Times Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:55 am by jlucivero
With this sweeping new rule, New York has become the first state in the nation to require all of its criminal trial judges to issue so-called “Brady orders” in every case (named after the 1963 case of Brady v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm by Kevin
In case you didn’t watch the episode, and you may not have, even though I linked to it above and am embedding it here— —I am of course forced to repeat some of Oliver’s allegedly offensive statements, just to provide necessary context for this report of a newsworthy item involving someone who is clearly a public figure, see New York Times Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
Although these types of public accusations may be `vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp,’ New York Times Co. v. [read post]