Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Sullivan"
Results 161 - 180
of 435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2007, 1:00 am
Elizabeth McDaniel, Sheppard's co-leader of the new group. [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:06 am
The unanimous ruling in KSR International Co. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
See New York Times v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:30 am
Rev. 101 (2012) The Story of New York Times Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 11:03 pm
" New York Times Co. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
App. 3d. 755, 758 (pdf) (biopsy allowed); Sullivan, Long & Haggerty, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 8:21 pm
Co.. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
” New York Times Co. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 5:00 pm
’”[xi] Here, Justice Ostrager determined that New York law is controlling because the Agreement was executed in New York and “is governed by New York law by way of a New York choice-of-law provision. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:40 pm
The event will focus on “The Court, the Closet and the Press.” Wrote the event’s coordinators: Just as New York Times v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 12:50 pm
Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), and New York Times Co. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:14 am
V. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am
I'm pleased to say, though, that American law has turned sharply against attempts to punish speech that insults or even defames foreign political leaders; the old libel rules wouldn't survive New York Times Co. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 5:05 am
In StarNet Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 10:41 am
MacLennan (1908), the case that first recognized something like an "actual malice" test for speech about public officials, and that was later cited prominently for this proposition by New York Times Co. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 6:09 am
Supreme Court ruled in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Verner (1963), New York Times v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 12:36 pm
See id. at 513 ("'The First Amendment's hostility to content-based regulation extends not only to restrictions of particular viewpoints, but also to prohibition of public discussion of an entire topic.'") (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In reaching this conclusion, the Ninth Circuit analyzed two key prior Supreme Court precedents: New York Times v. [read post]
