Search for: "New York Times Company v. Sullivan"
Results 21 - 40
of 313
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2023, 6:33 am
That argument stems from a New York State Court of Appeals ruling, Hoffman v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 6:35 pm
In New York Times Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 4:10 am
The certiorari petition asks the Supreme Court to reconsider the actual malice standard set out in New York Times v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 11:19 am
Sullivan of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a groundbreaking ruling denying first sale protection to resellers of digital music. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
 And at the New York Times, Patrick McGeehan looks back at Kelo v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
In The Dark Side of Defamation Law, a featured review in the New Yorker, Jeannie Suk Gersen reviews Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:39 am
Gorsuch comments in his dissent that the New York Times v Sullivan judgment was made at a time when major media companies employed vast teams of editors and fact-checkers, when broadcasters required licences and when news had to be physically printed and distributed at great cost. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 6:10 pm
Supreme Court in New York Times v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 10:22 am
” But that’s not the real advantage of spending much of my time in Cozen’s New York office. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 4:34 pm
The first amendment combined with the supreme court’s 1964 landmark case of New York Times v Sullivan means that the bar is set very high for celebrities or public figures who want to sue for defamation. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 10:00 am
In 1964, the Supreme Court decided New York Times Company v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 12:28 pm
[1] See Sullivan Financial Group, Inc, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
But Harty, who lives in Florida, does not allege he intended to actually stay at the hotel, in New York. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 8:19 am
Postmaster General, which in turn quoted from New York Times v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
This is also now the subject of a new bar complaint filed by a conservative legal group this week. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
Remember, after New York Times v. [read post]
22 Sep 2024, 5:49 am
” The legislators lifted the definition from New York Times v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 3:24 am
In last week’s appellate ruling in Zwarycz v Marnia Construction, Inc., 2015 NY Slip Op 06239 [2d Dept July 22, 2015], which affirmed a June 2014 post-trial decision by Westchester County Supreme Court Justice Robert DiBella, the plaintiff Michael Zwarycz overcame the absence of a stock certificate or any other direct evidence of share ownership to establish his 50% interest in two corporations that own residential apartment buildings in Yonkers, New… [read post]