Search for: "New York v. Class" Results 221 - 240 of 5,841
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm by David Bernstein
New York (1905) because "[t]he majority opinion was based upon 'a common understanding' as to the effect of work in bakeshops upon … those engaged in it. 'Common understanding' has ceased to be the reliance in matters calling for essentially scientific determination. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 7:00 am by Terry Hart
The New York class actions did not go down well with [Joseph] Saveri. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 8:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Breach of warranty and unjust enrichment claims under New York law, however, failed, as well as claims on behalf of a nationwide class. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Jack Greenberg, NAACP director-counsel of the Legal Defense and Educational fund, is seen at a news conference, Oct. 31, 1969, in New York. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
Under the Senatorial Classes Clause, that cohort of Senators would be divided into three classes: The Seats of the Senators of the first Class shall be vacated at the Expiration of the second Year, of the second Class at the Expiration of the fourth Year, and of the third Class at the Expiration of the sixth Year, so that one third may be chosen every second Year. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:28 am by Patricia Salkin
The District Court for the Eastern District of New York first addressed whether 31FO had standing to bring claims of racial and religious discrimination. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Samantha Barbas, Actual Malice:  Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm by Will Baude
[The real crisis seems to be in academia, not at the Court] Today's New York Times has a piece by Jesse Wegman on "The Crisis in Teaching Constitutional Law" that reflects the kinds of sentiments I've heard at conferences, lunch tables, and especially on social media—that it is hard to teach constitutional law today because the Supreme Court is doing such lawless stuff. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am by SHG
Michael McConnell, a conservative former federal appeals court judge who teaches at Stanford, was fine with the ultimate result in the New York gun case, but he rejected the legal reasoning the court used to get there. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
’”[7] Therefore, new case law will be impactful, given the present lack of specific laws about how AI capabilities may permissibly interface with copyrightable data such as visual images and artworks. [read post]