Search for: "New v. New" Results 1 - 20 of 177,597
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2015, 11:17 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
New York Abstract:      This article takes a look back at two of the major opinions of the criminal procedure revolution - Duncan v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:07 am by INFORRM
The appeal in the case JIH v News Group Newspapers ([2010] EWHC 2818 (QB)) was heard today by the Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Maurice Kay and Lady Justice Smith. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 8:24 am by Media Law Prof
Sullivan: An Essay in Honor of Martin Redish in volume 107 of the New York Times v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
As dedicated CAAFlog readers know, I have been suggesting that the cert petition in New v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 72 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Patel & Ors v SSHD, Anwar v SSHD, and Alam v SSHD [2013] UKSC 72 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 2:30 am by Matrix LegalĀ  Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2013] UKSC 72 For Court’s press summary, please download: Court’s Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII The post New Judgment: Patel & Ors v SSHD, Anwar v SSHD, and Alam v SSHD [2013] UKSC 72 appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 9:06 am by John Zarych
However, even though Schedule V drugs are less severe compared […] The post The Sentencing Guidelines for First-Time Schedule V Drug Offenses in New Jersey appeared first on . [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:37 pm
What's most interesting about today's Supreme Court decision in Delaware v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:46 am by sally
Coogan v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another; Phillips v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 48; [2012] WLR (D) 18 “The phrase ‘technical or commercial information or other intellectual property’ within the definition of ‘intellectual property’ in section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 was apt to embrace telephone voice messages said to have been intercepted by a private investigator on the telephones of individuals; and the effect of that finding was… [read post]