Search for: "Nicholas Bagley" Results 21 - 40 of 146
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 pm by Kali Borkoski
 Speakers will include Julie Rovner, Nicholas Bagley, and Michael Cannon. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Nathan Cortez
Nicholas Bagley, Bedside Bureaucrats: Why Medicare Reform Hasn’t Worked, 101 Geo. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 3:30 am by Mary Crossley
Nicholas Bagley, Medicine as a Public Calling, 114 Mich. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:18 am by Walter Olson
Marvel Entertainment, LLC is here: I see what you did there, Justice Kagan. — Nicholas Bagley (@nicholas_bagley) June 22, 2015 Nice one, Kagan. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 7:50 pm
" At "The Incidental Economist," Nicholas Bagley has a post that begins, "A district court in Washington, DC ruled Wednesday that the House of Representatives has standing to bring a lawsuit alleging that the Obama administration is spending federal money to finance the ACA, absent a congressional appropriation. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 7:03 pm
University of Michigan’s Nicholas Bagley does a fine job of shredding the logic of the court’s opinion in an article posted online today by the New England Journal of Medicine. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Here are links to the content, listed by the name of the contributor:Kristin Collins (Boston University)Bill Novak (University of Michigan)Nicholas Bagley (University of Michigan)Jon Michaels (UCLA)Gautham Rao (American University)UPDATE: Here's Parrillo's response to the posts above. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 1:05 pm by Howard Wasserman
Good analysis from Nicholas Bagley (Michigan) about the standing problems for the two individual plaintiffs in the ACA litigation. [read post]
5 May 2015, 4:05 am by Paul Caron
We are delighted to welcome Nicholas Bagley (Michigan), Peter Conti-Brown (Stanford), Andy Grewal (Iowa), Bruce Huber (Notre Dame), Jeffrey Pojanowski... [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 12:57 pm by Howard Bashman
The Columbia Law Review has posted online its newly published article by law professors Julian Davis Mortenson and Nicholas Bagley titled “Delegation at the Founding. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:54 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Texans Challenging Obamacare Have No Standing; If there’s no penalty for going without insurance, there’s no injury; That should be obvious”: Law professor Nicholas Bagley has this essay online at The Atlantic. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 8:28 am by Allison Zieve
Among the takeaways: Overall, [Professor] Nicholas Bagley says, the ACA has been "pretty resilient to everything, so far, that the Trump administration has thrown at it. [read post]
2 May 2014, 7:43 am
Over at The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley has an interesting post on whether the Department of Health and Human Services has the legal authority to fund its risk corridors. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 6:22 am by Howard Bashman
Online at The New York Times, law professor Nicholas Bagley has an essay titled “Why Trump’s New Push to Kill Obamacare Is So Alarming: It’s not just the potential damage to the health care system and the people who depend on it; It’s also the threat, in the administration’s legal logic, to the rule of law. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:49 am
Kristina Daugirdas and Nicholas Bagley made a valiant effort in our Couple of the Month contest. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:12 am by Jonathan H. Adler
 As Nicholas Bagley explains, there is more legal authority for this move than the prior delays. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
  Jonathan Adler and Nicholas Bagley debate the merits of the case in an appearance posted at The Incidental Economist (video), while in the New Republic Brian Beutler contends that “[t]he Chinese wall separating political and legal arguments is breaking down in King, because the challenge itself is such a farce. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:29 pm
On September 30, I drove up to Ann Arbor for the “Thrilla in Ann Arbor,” a debate with the University of Michigan’s Nicholas Bagley on legality of the IRS rule authorizing tax credits in federal exchanges at issue in Halbig v. [read post]