Search for: "Nicholas Bagley" Results 21 - 40 of 169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2019, 7:14 pm by Howard Bashman
” Law professor Nicholas Bagley will have this essay in the Sunday Review section of this upcoming Sunday’s edition of The New York Times. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 pm by Kali Borkoski
 Speakers will include Julie Rovner, Nicholas Bagley, and Michael Cannon. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 6:25 am
" that Nicholas Bagley had yesterday at "The Incidental Economist" blog. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:00 pm by Howard Bashman
“There’s No Historical Justification for One of the Most Dangerous Ideas in American Law; The Founders didn’t believe that broad delegations of legislative power violated the Constitution, but conservative originalists keep insisting otherwise”: Law professors Julian Davis Mortenson and Nicholas Bagley have this essay online at The Atlantic. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 12:58 am by Howard Bashman
“Trump’s Sabotage of Obamacare Is Illegal; A president doesn’t have the right to dispense with laws he dislikes”: Law professors Nicholas Bagley and Abbe R. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 8:11 am by nflatow
By Nicholas Bagley, Assistant Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Nathan Cortez
Nicholas Bagley, Bedside Bureaucrats: Why Medicare Reform Hasn’t Worked, 101 Geo. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 3:30 am by Mary Crossley
Nicholas Bagley, Medicine as a Public Calling, 114 Mich. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:18 am by Walter Olson
Marvel Entertainment, LLC is here: I see what you did there, Justice Kagan. pic.twitter.com/sxjm3396xB — Nicholas Bagley (@nicholas_bagley) June 22, 2015 Nice one, Kagan. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:54 pm by Howard Bashman
“The Texans Challenging Obamacare Have No Standing; If there’s no penalty for going without insurance, there’s no injury; That should be obvious”: Law professor Nicholas Bagley has this essay online at The Atlantic. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Here are links to the content, listed by the name of the contributor:Kristin Collins (Boston University)Bill Novak (University of Michigan)Nicholas Bagley (University of Michigan)Jon Michaels (UCLA)Gautham Rao (American University)UPDATE: Here's Parrillo's response to the posts above. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 7:50 pm
" At "The Incidental Economist," Nicholas Bagley has a post that begins, "A district court in Washington, DC ruled Wednesday that the House of Representatives has standing to bring a lawsuit alleging that the Obama administration is spending federal money to finance the ACA, absent a congressional appropriation. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 12:57 pm by Howard Bashman
The Columbia Law Review has posted online its newly published article by law professors Julian Davis Mortenson and Nicholas Bagley titled “Delegation at the Founding. [read post]
5 May 2015, 4:05 am by Paul Caron
We are delighted to welcome Nicholas Bagley (Michigan), Peter Conti-Brown (Stanford), Andy Grewal (Iowa), Bruce Huber (Notre Dame), Jeffrey Pojanowski... [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 7:03 pm
University of Michigan’s Nicholas Bagley does a fine job of shredding the logic of the court’s opinion in an article posted online today by the New England Journal of Medicine. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 1:05 pm by Howard Wasserman
Good analysis from Nicholas Bagley (Michigan) about the standing problems for the two individual plaintiffs in the ACA litigation. [read post]
2 May 2014, 7:43 am
Over at The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley has an interesting post on whether the Department of Health and Human Services has the legal authority to fund its risk corridors. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:49 am
Kristina Daugirdas and Nicholas Bagley made a valiant effort in our Couple of the Month contest. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 6:22 am by Howard Bashman
Online at The New York Times, law professor Nicholas Bagley has an essay titled “Why Trump’s New Push to Kill Obamacare Is So Alarming: It’s not just the potential damage to the health care system and the people who depend on it; It’s also the threat, in the administration’s legal logic, to the rule of law. [read post]