Search for: "Nicholas Bagley"
Results 41 - 60
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2018, 3:50 pm
As Nicholas Bagley notes, in order to have standing, "it's not enough that you feel compelled; you must actually be compelled. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:54 pm
“The Texans Challenging Obamacare Have No Standing; If there’s no penalty for going without insurance, there’s no injury; That should be obvious”: Law professor Nicholas Bagley has this essay online at The Atlantic. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 1:05 pm
Good analysis from Nicholas Bagley (Michigan) about the standing problems for the two individual plaintiffs in the ACA litigation. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 11:54 am
On Friday, December 14, Judge Reed O’Connor of the Federal District Court in the Northern District of Texas issued a declaratory judgment holding the shared responsibility provision (also referred to as the “Individual Mandate”), and with it, the entire Affordable Care Act (“ACA”), to be unconstitutional. [read post]
15 Dec 2018, 2:38 pm
“The latest ACA ruling is raw judicial activism and impossible to defend”: Law professor Nicholas Bagley has this essay online at The Washington Post. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:48 pm
For those interested, there is a more extensive discussion of the severability issue in the amicus brief I joined with several other legal scholars, including Jonathan Adler, Nicholas Bagley, Abbe Gluck, and Kevin Walsh. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 5:42 am
” Law professors Nicholas Bagley and Samuel Bray have this essay online at The Atlantic. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 1:00 am
., Jr.15 Hyman, David16 Andrews, Lori17 Pope, Thaddeus18 Orentlicher, David19 Robertson, Christopher20 Francis, Leslie P.20 Bagley, Nicholas [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 12:58 am
“Trump’s Sabotage of Obamacare Is Illegal; A president doesn’t have the right to dispense with laws he dislikes”: Law professors Nicholas Bagley and Abbe R. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 6:52 am
As Nicholas Bagley notes, the DOJ brief targets the relevant provisions of the U.S. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:09 am
” The rule, argue Sachs and co-authors Nicholas Bagley of the University of Michigan and Darius N. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 1:55 pm
Nicholas Bagley is “flummoxed” by Bates’s decision in this regard, and I share his confusion. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 3:30 am
Nicholas Bagley, Federalism and the End of Obamacare, 127 Yale L.J. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 1:09 pm
Administrative Law New Scholarship Roundtable Host Committee Nicholas Bagley, University of MichiganMichael Sant’Ambrogio, Michigan State UniversityMiriam Seifter, University of WisconsinPeter Shane, The Ohio State UniversityGlen Staszewski, Michigan State UniversityChristopher Walker, The Ohio State University [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 5:23 am
As Nicholas Bagley notes, EOs are, in many respects, a communications strategy. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 3:30 am
Nicholas Bagley, Remedial Restraint in Administrative Law, Columbia Law Review (forthcoming 2017), available via SSRN. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 9:56 am
Nonetheless, I agree with Nicholas Bagley that the court was correct to conclude that West Virginia lacks standing to challenge the action. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
Escobar, in which the Court ruled on the circumstances in which the implied false certification theory can be a basis for liability under the False Claims Act, comes from Joan Krause, who at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights suggests that, although “both parties quickly claimed victory, in reality the decision is likely to satisfy no one and to raise as many questions as it answers”; Richard Samp, who at the Washington Legal Foundation’s Legal Pulse concludes that, although the… [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:51 am
” Briefly: At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley offers “a modest proposal” to “fix” the Court’s recent decision in Gobeille v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 7:33 am
So those interested in the Affordable Care Act and the administrative law should give Nicholas Bagley’s new paper on “Legal Limits and the Implementation of the Affordable Care Act” a careful read. [read post]
