Search for: "Nicholas Bagley"
Results 81 - 100
of 169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm
Nicholas Bagley and Gary Lawson debate administrative law before the Notre Dame Student Chapter of the Federalist Society. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 8:43 am
See Nicholas Bagley's incisive analysis.2. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:00 pm
Nicholas Bagley is an Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am
” At Notice and Comment, Nicholas Bagley looks back at last month’s oral argument in Gobeille v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:19 am
(Abbe Gluck and Nicholas Bagley are the best sources for criticism I have seen, though there are many others.) [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 3:03 pm
Already posted are Jeff Pojanowski's introduction, and contributions from Ronald Levin, Kevin Stack, Mila Sohoni, Nicholas Bagley, Emily Bremer and Jennifer Mascott. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 1:09 pm
Administrative Law New Scholarship Roundtable Host Committee Nicholas Bagley, University of MichiganMichael Sant’Ambrogio, Michigan State UniversityMiriam Seifter, University of WisconsinPeter Shane, The Ohio State UniversityGlen Staszewski, Michigan State UniversityChristopher Walker, The Ohio State University [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:28 am
Health-care symposium contributors: Nicholas Bagley – University of Michigan Randy Barnett – Georgetown Michael Cannon – Cato David Rivkin – BakerHostetler Einer Elhauge – Harvard Tom Fisher – Indiana Abbe Gluck – Yale Brianne Gorod – Constitutional Accountability Center Timothy Jost – Washington and Lee Adam White – Boyden Gray & Associates Housing symposium contributors: Cory Andrews – Washington… [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:30 am
Briefly: At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley discusses the Court’s recent opinion in Armstrong v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:03 am
” Online at The Atlantic, law professor Nicholas Bagley has an essay titled “The Fallout of a SCOTUS Health-Care Decision Could Be Quick, Devastating, and Irreversible; Millions of Americans could lose their insurance — and neither Joe Biden nor the states will be in a good position to do much about it. [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
Bagley, of Bagley, Karpan, Rose & White, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing Appellee (Defendant): Dale W. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 6:35 am
Texas (Jonathan Adler, The Volokh Conspiracy) The Fallout of a SCOTUS Health-Care Decision Could Be Quick, Devastating, and Irreversible (Nicholas Bagley, The Atlantic) ObamaCare Returns to the Supremes (Editorial Board, The Wall Street Journal) The Affordable Care Act Challenge and the Senate Runoff Elections in Georgia (Michael Dorf, Verdict) Invalidate entire Affordable Care Act (Devin Watkins, USA Today) Obamacare faces Supreme Court remade by Trump (Susannah Luthi, Politico)… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:28 am
Commentary on yesterday’s oral argument comes from Nicholas Bagley at The Incidental Economist, Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog, and Nicole Huberfeld at HealthLawProf Blog. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 7:29 am
For both sides of the controversy, here’s a link to my debate with Nicholas Bagley. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 3:59 pm
In the meantime, here’s some commentary from Nicholas Bagley and Joshua Blackman. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:04 am
” In The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley considers whether, if the Court rules for the plaintiffs in King v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 7:48 pm
For those interested, there is a more extensive discussion of the severability issue in the amicus brief I joined with several other legal scholars, including Jonathan Adler, Nicholas Bagley, Abbe Gluck, and Kevin Walsh. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:12 pm
While our brief did not go into the standing issues, I have addressed them previously on this blog here and here, and Nicholas Bagley addressed them for The Atlantic. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 9:05 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In an article published in the Michigan Law Review, Professor Nicholas Bagley of the University of Michigan Law School argued that certain procedural constraints within administrative law should be eliminated as counterproductive and unnecessary. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
In a new paper, Julian Davis Mortenson and Nicholas Bagley of the University of Michigan Law School argue that the founders had no objection to Congress delegating the power to make rules, as long as it did not permanently abdicate its legislative responsibilities. [read post]
