Search for: "Nicholls v. Nicholls" Results 1 - 20 of 847
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am by Frank Cranmer
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
The courtroom asymmetry threatened by Harrison’s proffered testimony was that plaintiffs’ counsel could comment upon defendants’ lobbying, but defense counsel had no equivalent opportunity to comment upon the lawsuit’s extensive rent seeking.[10] [1] Nichols v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Georgia Stewart, Tumelo, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: ESG, ExxonMobil, Proxy voting, shareholder engagement, Shareholder power 2024 Proxy Season Preview: Looking for a Silver Lining Posted by Merel Spierings, The Conference Board, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: Compensation committees, disclosures, pass-through voting, Proxy season, Say on pay, Shareholder proposals Tornetta v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Georgia Stewart, Tumelo, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: ESG, ExxonMobil, Proxy voting, shareholder engagement, Shareholder power 2024 Proxy Season Preview: Looking for a Silver Lining Posted by Merel Spierings, The Conference Board, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: Compensation committees, disclosures, pass-through voting, Proxy season, Say on pay, Shareholder proposals Tornetta v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am by Allan Blutstein
The panel rationalized that alien IDs were merely digital placeholders allowing agency officials to trace immigrants, the value of which outweighed the burden of substituting functionally equivalent, non-exempt placeholders.AB: Requiring an agency to create identifiers that did not previously exist strikes me as the creation of a “new” record, which is precisely what the estimable Judge Nichols held in Institute for Justice v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:25 pm by Russell Knight
“[A] guardian ad litem under the Marriage Act is not an “advocate”” Nichols v. [read post]