Search for: "Nicholls v. Nicholls" Results 181 - 200 of 859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
“Likely” in this context normally means “more likely than not”, though a lesser prospect of success may suffice where the Court needs a short time to consider evidence/argument, or where the adverse consequences of publication might be extremely serious: Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2005] 1 AC 253 [16]-[23] (Lord Nicholls); ABC v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2329 [2019] EMLR 5 [16]. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:31 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Nichols, “The Social Organization of Access to Justice for Youth in ‘Unsafe’ Urban Neighbourhoods” (2018), 27 Soc. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The first strand Mr Sterling emphasised the importance of the headline, in particular Lord Nicholls’ observation that “Those who print defamatory headlines are playing with fire” (Charleston v News Group Newspapers Limited [1995] 2 AC 65, 74). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
  The defence was so called because it emanated from the judgment of the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers when Lord Nicholls set out a non-exhaustive list of ten factors to be taken into account when deciding whether the defence of qualified privilege should be available to a defendant newspaper reporting on matters of public interest: The seriousness of the allegation. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:36 am
” — John Nichols Suggested Reading:Buhle, Paul. [read post]