Search for: "Nicholls v. Nicholls"
Results 221 - 240
of 769
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2007, 9:12 am
"Two days later, the Court vacated an appellant's sentence, reversing the district court in Tennessee and remanding the case in Nichols v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 11:36 am
Affirmed.NFP criminal opinions today (1): Nichole Higgins v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:49 am
Nichols, a 67-page (!) [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Salinger sued over Hamilton's paraphrasing of his letters and an appeals court ruled against Hamilton, relying on a Learned Hand case, Nichols v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Matter of Gigliotti v Bianco, 2011 NY Slip Op 02206. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Matter of Gigliotti v Bianco, 2011 NY Slip Op 02206. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
For instance in the case of Nicholls v Rockwell Automation Ltd it was held the an ET should not have held that the employee’s dismissal was unfair because it thought some of the scores applied by the employer were too harsh or as it was held “(certain scores) were clearly lower than they should have been”. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am
They cite Lord Nicholls in Douglas v Hello 3 (OBG v Allan) as clearly stating that the concept of breach of confidence and misuse of private information “now covers two distinct causes of action”. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:53 am
The key issue before the courts in these cases is therefore whether the breach of an express term committed in connection with an employee’s dismissal falls within the principle established in Johnson V Unisys Ltd [2001] UKHL 13 (that is, an employee may not claim damages for breach of the implied term of trust and confidence where the circumstances that gave rise to the breach related only to the manner in which the employee had been dismissed, referred to as the ‘Johnson… [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 2:27 am
SK v WL, despite being decided on the 26th February 2010, has just been reported on Bailii. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 1:28 pm
California Coastal Commission to be mostly wrong, after the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Lingle v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
See Battle Creek Health Sys. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 9:07 pm
In Nichols v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
., Plaintiffs-Appellants, - v - THE LAW OFFICES OF DAVID M. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:29 pm
The sorts of factors to be taken into account, when reviewing the defendant’s conduct at the newsgathering stage, were listed by Lord Nicholls in Reynolds. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:09 pm
It was largely on this binary issue that the House of Lords was divided: Lords Nicholls and Lord Hoffmann felt that there was a public interest in allowing newspapers to publish details about her treatment whilst Lord Hoffmann also thought there was in the photograph (Lord Nicholls felt there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in it) whilst Lords Hope and Carswell and Baroness Hale disagreed. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 8:33 pm
Nichols, 176 Cal. [read post]
2 May 2019, 9:42 am
Although the Court of Appeals decision in the case, Nichols v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 11:08 am
Opponents argue the bill is unnecessary, as only the "worst of the worst" juvenile offenders are up for LWOP, especially in light of the recent SCOTUS decision Graham v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:44 am
In the related case of J.B.B.C. v. [read post]
