Search for: "Nicholls v. Nicholls" Results 241 - 260 of 857
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2012, 11:55 am by Joe Consumer
Supreme Court ruled in its 6-3 decision, Wyeth v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:55 am by Joe Consumer
Supreme Court ruled in its 6-3 decision, Wyeth v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:52 am by Eric Penzer
,quoting Lyons v Lyons, 187 AD2d 415, 416 [2d Dept 1992]). [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:36 am
” — John Nichols Suggested Reading:Buhle, Paul. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court referred also to the dicta of Lord Nicholls in Attorney General v Punch Ltd [2002] UKHL 50 at paragraph 35, which are well worth keeping in mind: “An interlocutory injunction, like any other injunction, must be expressed in terms which are clear and certain. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 9:12 am
"Two days later, the Court vacated an appellant's sentence, reversing the district court in Tennessee and remanding the case in Nichols v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 11:36 am
Affirmed.NFP criminal opinions today (1): Nichole Higgins v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
 Salinger sued over Hamilton's paraphrasing of his letters and an appeals court ruled against Hamilton, relying on a Learned Hand case, Nichols v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:30 am by Michael Scutt
For instance in the case of Nicholls v Rockwell Automation Ltd it was held the an ET should not have held that the employee’s dismissal was unfair because it thought some of the scores applied by the employer were too harsh or as it was held “(certain scores) were clearly lower than they should have been”. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:27 am by Andres
They cite Lord Nicholls in Douglas v Hello 3 (OBG v Allan) as clearly stating that the concept of breach of confidence and misuse of private information “now covers two distinct causes of action”. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:53 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
The key issue before the courts in these cases is therefore whether the breach of an express term committed in connection with an employee’s dismissal falls within the principle established in Johnson V Unisys Ltd [2001] UKHL 13 (that is, an employee may not claim damages for breach of the implied term of trust and confidence where the circumstances that gave rise to the breach related only to the manner in which the employee had been dismissed, referred to as the ‘Johnson… [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 2:27 am
SK v WL, despite being decided on the 26th February 2010, has just been reported on Bailii. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 1:28 pm
California Coastal Commission to be mostly wrong, after the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Lingle v. [read post]