Search for: "Nicholls v. Nicholls" Results 481 - 500 of 766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2011, 11:57 pm
The locus classicus on this area is the speech of Lord Nicholls in Tang Man Sit v Capacious Investments Ltd, where he draws a distinction between two types of alternative remedies- inconsistent and cumulative. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 2:27 am
SK v WL, despite being decided on the 26th February 2010, has just been reported on Bailii. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:53 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
The key issue before the courts in these cases is therefore whether the breach of an express term committed in connection with an employee’s dismissal falls within the principle established in Johnson V Unisys Ltd [2001] UKHL 13 (that is, an employee may not claim damages for breach of the implied term of trust and confidence where the circumstances that gave rise to the breach related only to the manner in which the employee had been dismissed, referred to as the ‘Johnson… [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 1:52 pm by Donn Zaretsky
  In the comments, Bruce Boyden says "if the other works in suit are like the 3 featured in the article, she’s going to make Nichols v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 9:06 pm by Jeralyn
In the 1895 Supreme Court decision, Coffin v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:36 pm by Will Aitchison
LEXIS at *21, plaintiffs here have provided a sufficient approximation of their overtime hours worked, see Nichols v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:58 am by Allison C. Smith
Earlier this month, CARB issued a revised analysis of alternatives to the cap-and-trade program, as ordered by the lower court in Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 8:01 am by David Smith
First, strictly temporally, is David Smith's version, followed by Dave's]Whittaker v Kinnear [2011] EWHC 1479 (QB)This case raises some interesting questions about estoppel and sale.K sold her property and it’s grounds to W and his business associate, Mr Nichols in 2007, apparently because she could no longer afford it. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:45 am by Julie Lam
On May 25, 2011, the Michigan Supreme Court granted the application for leave to appeal in Patterson v Nichols, Nos. 142438-9 and 142441, ordering that the cases be argued and submitted to the Court together. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:40 am by INFORRM
As the Court of Appeal in McKennitt v Ash ([2006] EWCA Civ 1714)remarked, “A v B cannot be read as any sort of binding authority on the content of articles 8 and 10. [read post]