Search for: "Nicholls v. Nicholls" Results 161 - 180 of 766
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2020, 6:53 am by Andrew Hamm
Nichols 19-794Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
As anticipated, and affirmed in Economou v de Freitas [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) (see our blog here), the new section 4 defence is being interpreted broadly in line with the principles of the common law ‘Reynolds’ privilege (although there remains some debate between practitioners as to the level of  importance to be attributed to each of the old ‘Reynolds criteria’ – Lord Nicholls’ checklist for good practice – in view… [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 11:35 pm
In Monster v NBA [2018] SGIPOS 16 ("NBA"), IP Adjudicator Burton Ong likewise endorsed considering 'surrounding circumstances' in the mark-similarity assessment. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for Newsweek, Isa Farrington Nichols, whose niece was murdered by convicted D.C. sniper Lee Boyd Malvo, weighs in on Mathena v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
“Likely” in this context normally means “more likely than not”, though a lesser prospect of success may suffice where the Court needs a short time to consider evidence/argument, or where the adverse consequences of publication might be extremely serious: Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2005] 1 AC 253 [16]-[23] (Lord Nicholls); ABC v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2329 [2019] EMLR 5 [16]. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:31 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Nichols, “The Social Organization of Access to Justice for Youth in ‘Unsafe’ Urban Neighbourhoods” (2018), 27 Soc. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The first strand Mr Sterling emphasised the importance of the headline, in particular Lord Nicholls’ observation that “Those who print defamatory headlines are playing with fire” (Charleston v News Group Newspapers Limited [1995] 2 AC 65, 74). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
  The defence was so called because it emanated from the judgment of the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers when Lord Nicholls set out a non-exhaustive list of ten factors to be taken into account when deciding whether the defence of qualified privilege should be available to a defendant newspaper reporting on matters of public interest: The seriousness of the allegation. [read post]