Search for: "Nichols v. Department of Corrections" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2024, 12:20 am by Frank Cranmer
But the court is not required to assess whether the Claimant’s understanding of Islam is correct or well founded’ (para 135). [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 26 May 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Open Rights Group) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 800. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
As anticipated, and affirmed in Economou v de Freitas [2016] EWHC 1853 (QB) (see our blog here), the new section 4 defence is being interpreted broadly in line with the principles of the common law ‘Reynolds’ privilege (although there remains some debate between practitioners as to the level of  importance to be attributed to each of the old ‘Reynolds criteria’ – Lord Nicholls’ checklist for good practice – in view… [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am by ELLIOT GOLD
The Court of Appeal held this to be a correct state of the law and their Lordships agree. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:21 am
Nichols, the Superintendent of Hale Creek Correctional Facility in Fulton County, was injured while coaching an employee volleyball team preparing to compete in the "Department of Correction Olympics. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by GuestPost
The interpretation of fairness clearly lies within the eye of the beholder, as noted by Lord Nicholls in White v White [2000] UKHL 54 and this concept is where the case law will now develop. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:30 am by INFORRM
This approach directly contradicts the understanding set out by Lords Nicholls and Hobhouse in Reynolds to the effect that the defence applies only to erroneous statements of fact. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
Hinnant, and Michael Nichols [hereinafter collectively referred to as Bey] are former tenured New York City Correction Department officers.Identifying themselves as "Black and of Moorish national origin,” and believing that they were exempt from federal and state taxes, they filed Federal and New York State tax forms claiming exemptions from income tax withholdings. [read post]