Search for: "Nichols v. Mitchell"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Georgia Stewart, Tumelo, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: ESG, ExxonMobil, Proxy voting, shareholder engagement, Shareholder power 2024 Proxy Season Preview: Looking for a Silver Lining Posted by Merel Spierings, The Conference Board, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: Compensation committees, disclosures, pass-through voting, Proxy season, Say on pay, Shareholder proposals Tornetta v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by Georgia Stewart, Tumelo, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: ESG, ExxonMobil, Proxy voting, shareholder engagement, Shareholder power 2024 Proxy Season Preview: Looking for a Silver Lining Posted by Merel Spierings, The Conference Board, on Tuesday, February 27, 2024 Tags: Compensation committees, disclosures, pass-through voting, Proxy season, Say on pay, Shareholder proposals Tornetta v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Nichols and Richard W. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Borak, Lee v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Borak, Lee v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
In every bid to transfer venue that Capitol riot defendants have raised, the key precedent the government has cited in response has been the same: Haldeman v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:57 am
Philip Nichols, presiding, which denied Jason Gregory Mitchell’s motions to correct what he asserts are illegal sentences. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 1:00 am
The non-precedential decision of Kimble v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm
The case of Advertising Standards Authority v Mitchell ([2019] EWHC 1469 (QB)) deals with the problem of a misdirected email. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 7:00 am
" Mitchell (quoting Nichols at 738). [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:11 am
The Court of Appeal distinguished the principles in Foakes v Beer (1884) 9 App Cas 605 and in re Selectmove [1995] 1 WLR 474 and instead followed Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd [1991] 1 QB 1. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Nichols, 656 F.3d 1251 (10th Cir. 2011) (joined opinion) “claim brought by Texas municipality was not redressable under dormant Commerce Clause” United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 4:28 pm
Thomas Girardi is an inductee at The Trial Lawyer Hall of Fame who's commonly known for his work in Anderson v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:30 am
Ideally that selection criteria should be objective and non-discriminatory as possible, although previous case law (Mitchells of Lancaster (Brewers)Ltd v Tattersall) has held that using non-objective criteria is not fatal to a redundancy selection exercise, provided the criteria is used fairly. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:04 am
.] : Continuing Professional Development, Law Society of Upper Canada, 2012 1 v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Cook & Nichols, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
Nichols and Jeanette M. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm
However, as the One Brick Court case comment points out the proposition from Lord Nicholls which was disapproved in the case was criticised in the latest editions of leading textbooks and Eady J expressly dissented from it in the course of the most comprehensive recent analysis of the defence in Lowe v Associated Newspapers [2007] QB 580. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
NLRB Law Memo 02/13/2009 by LawMemo - First in Employment Law. [read post]
