Search for: "Nicholson v. Nicholson" Results 1 - 20 of 360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2024, 10:48 pm by Frank Cranmer
  The ET had concluded, however, that all the beliefs relied on by Ms Omooba met the tests set out in Grainger Plc & Ors v Nicholson [2010] ICR 360 and were protected under the Equality Act – and that part of the ruling was not appealed [43]. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 2:57 am by Frank Cranmer
Case-notes DLA Piper has just published a series of notes on leading cases on religion/belief and employment law: Bailey v Stonewall Equality Ltd and Garden Court Chambers (2020) Fahmy v Arts Council England (2023) Furlong v The Chief Constable of Cheshire Police (2019) Grainger Plc and others v Nicholson (2010) Higgs v Farmor’s School (2023) Joanna Phoenix v Open University (2024) Ladele v London Borough of Islington… [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:32 am by Camilla Hrdy
   Other pre-ChatGPT work I found helpful: Carys Craig (copyright and AI authorship) Daryl Lim (AI and innovation policy), Arti Rai & Nicholson Price (medicine drug development machine learning). [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:18 pm by Jennifer Niles Coffin
Joining every other circuit to decide the question, the Sixth Circuit held in Nicholson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm by Marketing
[v] From the effective date forward, the VA owes monthly compensation to the claimant. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 2:45 am by Frank Cranmer
The school argued that her beliefs under (a) and (b) did not meet the test for protection under s.10 Equality Act 2010 as laid down in Grainger plc v Nicholson [2010] ICR 360 EAT. [read post]
22 May 2023, 12:13 am by Frank Cranmer
Grainger plc v Nicholson [2010] ICR 360 established five criteria for what constitutes a protected belief for the purposes of section 10 (Religion or belief) of the Equality Act 2010, as follows: The belief must be genuinely held; It must be a belief and not an opinion or viewpoint based on the present state of information available; It must be a belief as to a weighty and substantial aspect of human life and behaviour; It must attain a certain level of cogency, seriousness,… [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:08 am by Guest Author
In the context of content moderation (and platform regulation more broadly), this can mean that rather than the flat on-off debates we are currently having (as with the debate over Section 230 in Gonzalez v. [read post]