Search for: "Nick Rosenkranz"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center Prof. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 6:01 am
So reports The College Fix (Christopher Tremoglie): Nick, a leading constitutional law scholar at Georgetown, is also the cofounder of Heterodox Academy. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 2:55 pm
[How Appealing] * Warm words from Eugene Volokh for his co-blogger Nick Rosenkranz, a possible Second Circuit nominee. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:25 pm
I was delighted to see BuzzFeed (Zoe Tillman) report that our very own Nick Rosenkranz — a top scholar of constitutional structure and constitutional interpretation, who teaches at Georgetown University Law Center, and a former law clerk to Judge Frank Easterbrook and Justice Anthony M. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:45 pm
(See also a discussion of basically the same issue in Nick Rosenkranz‘s article, Federal Rules of Statutory Interpretation, at pp. 2131-32 — that discussion shows that there’s a federal statute presenting much the same issue, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 5:19 pm
When I was still in college, co-conspirator Nick Rosenkranz published a justly famous article called “Federal Rules of Statutory Interpretation,” arguing that Congress could and should authorize written rules for interpreting federal statutes. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:58 am
Randy Barnett and Nick Rosenkranz to the law school community, posted at Above the Law, in response to Prof. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:27 am
Taking it from there, Barnett and Rosenkranz didn't go far into left-speak. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 1:03 pm
More from the open letter by Nick Rosenkranz and Randy Barnett sent in response to Gary Peller's callous screed against Justice Scalia: Nick first tried to put the issue in context, reiterating that... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 10:24 am
Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) is a University of Miami School of Law graduate and has a excellent team of legal advisers, including the VC’s own Nick Rosenkranz. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
” [Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz] More: Jonathan Adler on a widely noted Arthur Brooks op-ed on ideological imbalance in the academy. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:26 pm
Nick Rosenkranz (one of a handful of conservatives on the faculty), notes on the Volokh Conspiracy:John McGinnis has an excellent post over at Library of Law and Liberty (and cross-posted at our new Heterodox Academy), highlighting the rigid liberal orthodoxy of the Association of American Law Schools (AALS). [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
I’ve recently been blogging about my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 7:24 am
Nick Bagley (Michigan), and with our own Nick Rosenkranz moderating. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:05 pm
John Harrison (Virginia), Gillian Metzger (Columbia), and Zachary Price (Hastings), and our very own Nick Rosenkranz (Georgetown), moderated by Prof. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:56 am
I was delighted to see that our co-conspirator, Nick Rosenkranz, has been named to the Board of Directors of The Federalist Society. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
Academic panelists will include — among many others — Richard Epstein, Chai Feldblum, Gail Heriot, Lucian Bebchuk, Jonathan Turley, Neal Katyal, Randy Kennedy, our own Jonathan Adler and Nick Rosenkranz, and [Eugene Volokh]. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:54 am
Academic panelists will include — among many others — Richard Epstein, Chai Feldblum, Gail Heriot, Lucian Bebchuk, Jonathan Turley, Neal Katyal, Randy Kennedy, our own Jonathan Adler and Nick Rosenkranz, and me. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 6:34 am
Nick Rosenkranz is probably right that, as a matter of the strict formal “rules” peddled by some usage books, “Whomever you’re writing for will appreciate…” is correct, just like “Whomever you elect will serve…. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 11:18 am
But Justice Scalia seems to think that the anti-police-power principle serves as a backdrop that helps to show why the Rosenkranz interpretation of the Treaty Power is the more reasonable one, even apart from the text. [read post]
