Search for: "Nick Rosenkranz" Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2014, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Congratulations to my colleague Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz and the Cato Institute amicus program (i.e. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
Interested readers may wish to check out last year’s VC debate on the scope of the treaty power between Rick Hasen, co-bloggers Nick Rosenkranz and Eugene Kontorovich, and myself. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
Interested readers may wish to check out last year’s VC debate on the scope of the treaty power between Rick Hasen, co-bloggers Nick Rosenkranz and Eugene Kontorovich, and myself. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:30 am
(In the process, Justice Scalia’s concurrence, joined by Justice Thomas, cited our own Nick Rosenkranz’s “Executing the Treaty Power,” 118 Harv. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:39 am
 Here’s Nick Rosenkranz’s post on his amicus brief in the case and you can find many other related posts here. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:32 am
Our own Jonathan Adler and Nick Rosenkranz will be among the panelists, Sen. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:31 am
Here we are after the performance (from left to right): Stewart Butler, Randy Barnett, John Collins (Artistic Director, Elevator Repair Service), Ilya Somin and moderator Nick Rosenkranz): The Volokh Conspiracy on Stage @ Woolly Mammoth It is good to be a Conspirator. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Nick Rosenkranz
(Nick Rosenkranz) Professor Victor Williams and I will debate at the Cato Institute tomorrow. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:29 pm by Nick Rosenkranz
(Nick Rosenkranz) Senator Ted Cruz has an excellent essay in the Harvard Law Review Forum entitled Limits on the Treaty Power. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 9:54 am by Will Baude
The Review-Preview also contains interesting-looking articles by Fernando Teson, Barry Friedman, Ilya Shapiro, Peter Shane, and by co-bloggers David Bernstein and Nick Rosenkranz. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 10:28 am by Nick Rosenkranz
(Nick Rosenkranz) Radiolab just did a nice segment about Bond v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 10:47 am by Nick Rosenkranz
(Nick Rosenkranz) On Tuesday morning at 10:00am, the House Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing about the President’s constitutional duty “to take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 10:55 am by Will Baude
Noel Canning (the Supreme Court’s recess appointments case) on behalf of ourselves and a group of other constitutional law scholars, including co-conspirators Dale Carpenter, Eugene Kontorovich, and Nick Rosenkranz, as well as Nathan Chapman, Samuel Bray, John Eastman, Richard Epstein, Michael Greve, Joshua Hawley, Kurt Lash, and Sai Prakash. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 11:59 am by Eugene Volokh
The debaters will be Sandy Levinson and Alan Dershowitz against Dave Kopel and me, and a live video stream will be available starting 6:45 Eastern tonight at this site, or (in theory) just by clicking below: For an extra Volokh Conspiracy connection, note that Intelligence2 U.S. was launched by Robert Rosenkranz, the father of our own Nick Rosenkranz. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 6:47 pm by John Bellinger
With respect to Nick Rosenkranz’s argument, such a holding would not implicate Missouri v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 4:39 pm by Ilya Somin
The Necessary and Proper Clause does not give such authority to Congress for reasons outlined by co-blogger Nick Rosenkranz in his important article on the subject. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 10:31 pm by Orin Kerr
Here are the feeds I could find, with apologies to any I may have missed: @kennethanderson @crescat (Will Baude) @EVKontorovich @OrinKerr @IlyaSomin @profnqr (Nick Rosenkranz) @stewartbaker @NitaFarahany @johnpelwood There is also a @VolokhC account, although it’s just an automatic feed of all VC posts. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 12:16 pm by Orin Kerr
This year’s group of speakers includes five VC bloggers: Jonathan Adler, Randy Barnett, John Elwood, Nick Rosenkranz, and Eugene Volokh. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 7:31 am by Nick Rosenkranz
(Nick Rosenkranz) The House of Representatives cannot only refuse, but they alone can propose, the supplies requisite for the support of government. [read post]