Search for: "Nick Rosenkranz" Results 41 - 60 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2009, 7:07 pm
In an essay entitled “An American Amendment” that has already received a fair bit of attention in the blogosphere, see here and here, Nick Rosenkranz (Georgetown University Law Center) proposes a constitutional amendment that prohibits reliance on contemporary foreign law in interpreting the Constitution, see here. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Congratulations to my colleague Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz and the Cato Institute amicus program (i.e. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 11:36 am by Walter Olson
Academic panelists will include — among many others — Richard Epstein, Chai Feldblum, Gail Heriot, Lucian Bebchuk, Jonathan Turley, Neal Katyal, Randy Kennedy, our own Jonathan Adler and Nick Rosenkranz, and [Eugene Volokh]. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:31 am
Here we are after the performance (from left to right): Stewart Butler, Randy Barnett, John Collins (Artistic Director, Elevator Repair Service), Ilya Somin and moderator Nick Rosenkranz): The Volokh Conspiracy on Stage @ Woolly Mammoth It is good to be a Conspirator. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 10:55 am by Will Baude
Noel Canning (the Supreme Court’s recess appointments case) on behalf of ourselves and a group of other constitutional law scholars, including co-conspirators Dale Carpenter, Eugene Kontorovich, and Nick Rosenkranz, as well as Nathan Chapman, Samuel Bray, John Eastman, Richard Epstein, Michael Greve, Joshua Hawley, Kurt Lash, and Sai Prakash. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 10:24 am by David Bernstein
Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) is a University of Miami School of Law graduate and has a excellent team of legal advisers, including the VC’s own Nick Rosenkranz. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:15 pm by Mark Tushnet
Nick Rosenkranz’s post on the conference refers to Jack’s “powerful comments on what it is like to be a right-leaning professor at Harvard Law School. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 6:47 pm by John Bellinger
With respect to Nick Rosenkranz’s argument, such a holding would not implicate Missouri v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” [Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz] More: Jonathan Adler on a widely noted Arthur Brooks op-ed on ideological imbalance in the academy. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:39 am
 Here’s Nick Rosenkranz’s post on his amicus brief in the case and you can find many other related posts here. [read post]
9 May 2013, 8:30 pm by Ross Davies
Meyer Debate on the Treaty Power, The Volokh Conspiracy, Jan. 13-Feb. 3, 2013, by Nick Rosenkranz, Eugene Kontorovich, Rick Pildes & Ilya Somin The Decision to Uphold the Mandate as Tax Represents a Gestalt Shift in Constitutional Law, Legal Theory Blog, June 28, 2012, by Lawrence Solum Asian-Americans, Affirmative Action, and Fisher v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 11:18 am
But Justice Scalia seems to think that the anti-police-power principle serves as a backdrop that helps to show why the Rosenkranz interpretation of the Treaty Power is the more reasonable one, even apart from the text. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 4:39 pm by Ilya Somin
The Necessary and Proper Clause does not give such authority to Congress for reasons outlined by co-blogger Nick Rosenkranz in his important article on the subject. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 7:40 pm by Curtis Bradley
  As a result, I have followed with great interest an ongoing debate about this issue, on The Volokh Conspiracy, between Rick Pildes and Nick Rosenkranz, with interventions by Ilya Somin and Eugene Kontorovich. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:32 am
Our own Jonathan Adler and Nick Rosenkranz will be among the panelists, Sen. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
Interested readers may wish to check out last year’s VC debate on the scope of the treaty power between Rick Hasen, co-bloggers Nick Rosenkranz and Eugene Kontorovich, and myself. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm by Randy Barnett
Recently, my colleague, Nick Rosenkranz has argued here that, on textualist grounds, no such challenge should ever succeed. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
Interested readers may wish to check out last year’s VC debate on the scope of the treaty power between Rick Hasen, co-bloggers Nick Rosenkranz and Eugene Kontorovich, and myself. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:45 pm by Sasha Volokh
(See also a discussion of basically the same issue in Nick Rosenkranz‘s article, Federal Rules of Statutory Interpretation, at pp. 2131-32 — that discussion shows that there’s a federal statute presenting much the same issue, 42 U.S.C. [read post]