Search for: "Nick Rosenkranz" Results 61 - 73 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2013, 4:39 pm by Ilya Somin
The Necessary and Proper Clause does not give such authority to Congress for reasons outlined by co-blogger Nick Rosenkranz in his important article on the subject. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 7:40 pm by Curtis Bradley
  As a result, I have followed with great interest an ongoing debate about this issue, on The Volokh Conspiracy, between Rick Pildes and Nick Rosenkranz, with interventions by Ilya Somin and Eugene Kontorovich. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 9:20 pm
  His essay echoes a 2005 article by Nick Rosenkranz in proposing that there may be non-self-executing treaties that are valid as exercises of the Treaty Power but nonetheless do not give Congress any power beyond those enumerated elsewhere in the Constitution. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:54 am by Ted Frank
Part of the problem is Congressional laziness, a tendency to punt issues to the Supreme Court with poorly drawn legislation that grants large swaths of judicial discretion to interpret Congressional commands; for that, see Nick Rosenkranz. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 9:32 am
Our own Jonathan Adler and Nick Rosenkranz will be among the panelists, Sen. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
 We (and in a different way Nick Rosenkranz) have argued that the Salerno language overstates the difficulty of bringing a facial challenge. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
Interested readers may wish to check out last year’s VC debate on the scope of the treaty power between Rick Hasen, co-bloggers Nick Rosenkranz and Eugene Kontorovich, and myself. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:55 am
Interested readers may wish to check out last year’s VC debate on the scope of the treaty power between Rick Hasen, co-bloggers Nick Rosenkranz and Eugene Kontorovich, and myself. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm by Randy Barnett
Recently, my colleague, Nick Rosenkranz has argued here that, on textualist grounds, no such challenge should ever succeed.   [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 12:45 pm by Sasha Volokh
(See also a discussion of basically the same issue in Nick Rosenkranz‘s article, Federal Rules of Statutory Interpretation, at pp. 2131-32 — that discussion shows that there’s a federal statute presenting much the same issue, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:30 am
(In the process, Justice Scalia’s concurrence, joined by Justice Thomas, cited our own Nick Rosenkranz’s “Executing the Treaty Power,” 118 Harv. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
  Volokh has also posted video of a recent Federalist Society Supreme Court preview panel, featuring Orin Kerr, Nick Rosenkranz, Gene Schaerr, and Cleta Mitchell, and moderated by Robert Barnes. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:50 am
I’ve recently been blogging about my new article, The Inherent-Powers Corollary: Judicial Non-Delegation and Federal Common Law, which I’ve posted to SSRN. [read post]