Search for: "Nicol v. Ames" Results 61 - 80 of 159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2015, 7:24 pm by Sergio Muñoz Sarmiento
Where: The School of Visual Arts (NYC), 33 West 21st Street, 9th Floor MFA FLEX ROOM, New York, NY When: Saturday, December 12, 2015, 11:00 am – 6:00 pm Free and Open to the Public: You must RSVP by Thursday, December 10th, to Nicole Beletsky. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The most high profile case of the week was the judgment of Nicol J in the case of Starr v Ward ([2015] EWHC 1987 (QB)). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
This judge began his opinion by explaining what the case was about and the nature of the cross-motions for summary judgment: Nicole March (`March’) brings this action under the Court’s diversity jurisdiction, and alleges various state law claims against Defendants Best Buy Stores, LP (`Best Buy’) and Geek Squad Technical Support (`Geek Squad’). [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
I am part of a group of constitutional and property law scholars who have filed an amicus brief in, Horne v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:28 am by Amy Howe
  However, I am not affiliated with the firm.] [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:05 am by Ronald Mann
It looks like the Justices are firmly committed to deciding Tibble v. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
(a)  Hodge Jones & Allen LLP v Times Newspapers Ltd (b)  Brand v NGN (c)  Walliams v NGN. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:46 am by Amy Howe
  However, I am not affiliated with the firm.] [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
Chief Justice Rehnquist no doubt spoke for most judges and lawyers in expressing his discomfort with the notion that courts would have to actually look at science (rather than qualifications, demeanor, and credibility)[17]: “I defer to no one in my confidence in federal judges; but I am at a loss to know what is meant when it is said that the scientific status of a theory depends on its ‘falsifiability’, and I suspect some of them will be, too. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:48 am by Amy Howe
  However, I am not affiliated with the firm. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 8:22 am by Susan Schneider
Civita at #HungerSummit - as a #foodlawyer I am v impressed! [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
There were also several resolved complaints, including: Mr Charles Tubbs v Daily Mail, No clause specified, 29/04/2013; Dr John Little v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/04/2013; Mrs Deborah Farrell v That’s Life, Clause 1, 25/04/2012; Jessica Westwood v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Neil Turner v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Ms Judy Gibbons v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause… [read post]