Search for: "Nicol v. Ames"
Results 121 - 140
of 168
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
Don’t get me wrong—I am unaware of any legal impediment to an active-duty military officer serving as National Security Advisor (especially because, as noted below, the position neither requires Senate confirmation nor appears at levels I–V of the Executive Schedule), and General McMaster isn’t the first. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Report and Blog) Global - Patents New exchange, Intellectual Property Exchange International, can be a game-changer, but will need good patents to thrive (IAM) (Technology Transfer Tactics) Australia Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute: Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (Managing IP) (ipwars) Belgium Belgian Supreme Court prohibits fishing expeditions: Ineos Manufacturing Belgium NV and Ineos… [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 1:47 pm
In Tobe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:09 am
“Agradecemos la solidaridad de la mayoría de los pueblos y de los gobiernos de América Latina, del Caribe. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm
In suggesting that it would be unnecessary for him to make a decision about some of the less relevant parts of the evidence, Nicol J said: “I am struggling at the moment to find why I would have to make a decision as to who defecated in this bed” . [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
Highland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
(Am. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Am. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:10 am
Heck, I may even drive down the Thruway and tweet oral arguments of the LMK Psychological Services v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 10:32 am
Cordero Alvarez, “Algunos problemas de aplicación del art. 5.3º del reglamento 44/2001” María López de Tejada Ruiz, “La incompatibilidad de decisiones en los nuevos reglamentos comunitarios” María Jesús Elvira Benayas, “Una visión transversal del reglamento 1206/2001 sobre obtención de pruebas en materia civil y mercantil” Marta Casado Abarquero, “La investigación del patrimonio del deudor… [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 3:06 pm
Without a doubt, the most interesting oral argument so far, from a humor perspective anyway, was the one in FCC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
26 Am. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
They arrived after 2:30 AM on October 24 with Frank Jude and Lovell Harris. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
McLellan v Birbilis In McLellan v Birbilis, 2021 ONSC 7084, Justice Nicole Tellier debunked (again!) [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Am. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
To be clear, I am not in any way endorsing lawyers (and we know they exist) who are intentionally and even dangerously inflammatory. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:35 am
PAPERS lodged in Scotland’s Court of Session as part of a dispute between two solicitors have revealed William Macreath (aged 60) of Glasgow based law firm LEVY MCRAE has been accused of SEVEN COUNTS OF PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT and FIVE COUNTS OF INADEQUATE SERVICES by a reporter working for the Law Society of Scotland who was given the task of investigating complaints made against Mr Macreath in 2005 by another solicitor, Ms Norna Crabbe.Scant detail regarding the accusations against Mr… [read post]
