Search for: "Nix v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2020, 10:03 am
The Honorable Judge Daniel Bress Class dismissed.United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 10:02 pm
Nix, however, is the precedent cited in the new case, State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 4:58 pm
The FTC nixes non-competes One of the earliest reported cases challenging a non-compete clause was Mitchell v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 7:14 am
In Guilfoil v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:47 am
Supreme Court will hear the oral arguments in the case Garriot v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
In the mainstream press, the San Francisco Chronicle reports that "State Supreme Court nixes sales of shoes made with kangaroo hide" and the Los Angeles Times reports that "Adidas' use of kangaroo hide is illegal, state justices say. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm
It explains the cases of Nix v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:24 am
The Supreme Court held in 1983 that the Atomic Energy Act preempted safety regulation of nuclear power by States, leaving only economic regulation permissible to the states. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 8:09 am
English v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm
Supreme Court decisions based on the definition of acquittal set forth in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 11:58 am
Additional Resources: U.S. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:30 pm
The case is Lucia v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:04 am
See Nix v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 5:17 pm
Three years ago, in State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:18 am
The Kinston case, Nix v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)Earlier this month, United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge Richard Seeborg withheld his blessings from the proposed $20 million settlement in Fraley v. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:25 am
Congress’s enumerated powers don’t extend to making this local bar fight a federal hate crime [Ilya Shapiro on Cato brief in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 9:04 am
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently addressed the issue in Pittsburgh Logistics Systems v. [read post]
