Search for: "Nixon v. Administrator of General Services"
Results 1 - 20
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2017, 7:52 pm
Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425 (1977), the Court held that Congress could nationalize the documents, but that it was a 5th Amendment taking, requiring compensation. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:23 am
The Nixon administration amended this order with Executive Order 11478. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:23 am
The Nixon administration amended this order with Executive Order 11478. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:08 am
Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425, 457. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:05 am
At that time, the General Services Administration performed that function. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:30 pm
Administrator of General Services, 433 U. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 6:08 am
To the contrary, Nixon v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
In other words, Nixon was trying to subvert the established procedures of the Justice Department. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 11:16 am
Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425 (1977). [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
Nixon and Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
See Nixon v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
We have had 10 years of total control of the air in Laos and V. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Administrator of General Services, the court held that Nixon, as a former president, had standing to assert executive privilege. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 10:52 am
” In particular, Justice Gorsuch notes that the majority in Nixon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
” Attorney General’s Manual on the Administrative Procedure Act at 25. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
In 1970, (Republican) President Nixon signed Title X into law, which led to the creation of federally funded family-planning clinics across the country. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:54 am
Administrator of General Services. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
Nixon --Notes and Questions --Immigration and Naturalization Services v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
That said, once the documentary evidence is in the trial record, it is ordinary accessible to the general public without any particularized showing of need, Nixon v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:58 am
Are Conflicts Issues Ahead for Attorney General Nominee? [read post]
