Search for: "Nixon v. Fitzgerald" Results 1 - 20 of 92
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
That presumptive "privilege" is nowhere in the text of the Constitution but the tapes were released, Nixon resigned a few days later, and no political harm was done at the time in the eyes of most academics and judges.The same cannot be said for Nixon v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 5:48 am by Bernard Bell
  Though infrequently invoked to appoint special prosecutors from outside the Department of Justice, Attorney Generals have been relying on the Supreme Court’s 1974 precedent, Nixon v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:41 am by Josh Blackman
Fitzgerald as a something of a correction to Nixon. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 6:10 am by Norman L. Eisen
’” Op. at 14 (quoting, in part, the test in Nixon v. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 2:43 pm by Josh Blackman
Curiously, the statute says nothing at all about civil immunity under Nixon v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by JB
Indeed, the central holding of the Nixon tapes case, U.S. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:53 am by Andrew Weissmann
This new test is a bastardization of a test from a Supreme Court civil immunity case that did require balancing (in that case, Nixon v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 9:08 am by Jonathan H. Adler
There are multiple, non-textualist precedents that point the other way, however (Nixon v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 1:07 pm by Mark Walsh
But Roberts quickly pivots to Nixon v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm by Jon May
In support of this contention, Trump’s lawyer cited to the decision of the Supreme Court in Nixon v. [read post]