Search for: "Nixon v. Fitzgerald" Results 61 - 71 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
Again, the president is not above the law (as the dissenters in Nixon v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]