Search for: "Nixon v. Nixon" Results 21 - 40 of 1,290
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2024, 5:54 am by Adam Klasfeld
” Then, the brief finally shifts its focus to the immunity question, which leans on the Supreme Court’s opinion in Trump v. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 7:53 am by Dan Farber
  The story begins under President Nixon and extends through the Biden years. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:16 am by Adam Klasfeld
’” In making that finding, Mehta had quoted the Supreme Court’s strict test for incitement in the landmark case of Brandenberg v. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 8:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Professor Phillip Kurland raised this issue after Ford pardoned Nixon. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
This sets at odds two fundamental and compelling national interests: on the one hand, the Constitution's requirement that the President must not be unduly encumbered in fulfilling his weighty responsibilities, see Nixon v. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Repeatedly, later Presidents—Richard Nixon,[5] Gerald Ford,[6] Ronald Reagan,[7] Bill Clinton,[8] George W. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 7:30 am by David Super
  This group, to be sure, broke the impasse to pass the great civil rights laws of the 1960s, eventually forced an end to the Vietnam War, and ushered Richard Nixon out of the White House. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
Trump’s counsel argue in his appellate brief that (1) the Court in Nixon was wrong on the merits of the statutory authority question; and (2) what the Court unanimously wrote in Nixon about the statutory question was dicta, rather than a binding holding. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
The Supreme Court’s “Presumptive Immunity” Standard An especially baffling aspect of the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
That presumptive "privilege" is nowhere in the text of the Constitution but the tapes were released, Nixon resigned a few days later, and no political harm was done at the time in the eyes of most academics and judges.The same cannot be said for Nixon v. [read post]