Search for: "Nixon v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,057
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Perez v. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 4:58 pm
In Azar v. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 7:44 pm
Department of State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 5:57 am
While the governing executive orders make it clear that no one has a “right” to a security clearance, even the Supreme Court in the landmark decision Department of the Navy v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 4:00 am
Anderson and Trump v. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 10:56 am
" Fokker, 818 F.3d at 741 (alterations omitted); see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2025, 4:24 pm
The vilification of state and local election officials, many of them Republicans, after the 2020 election was part of this. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 7:01 am
” After Richard Nixon attempted to impound federal funds during his tenure (his administration often lost legal battles in federal court, including one case at the Supreme Court), Congress passed the Impoundment Control Act. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
In other words, the tweet doesn’t take direct issue with what Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in Marbury v. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 6:44 pm
(Much of the conduct for which President Nixon would have been impeached, had he not resigned, occurred during his first term, and the impeachment process began only in his second term.) [read post]
6 Feb 2025, 10:08 am
What the Nixon is this? [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 9:13 am
In Clinton v. [read post]
1 Feb 2025, 6:15 am
In 1974, the Supreme Court issued a momentous decision: In the case of Milliken v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 4:32 pm
When the Nixon administration attempted to impound funds across the federal budget, the Supreme Court heard two cases challenging the impoundment of EPA funds designated for state and municipal grants. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 2:12 pm
United States opinion. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 6:50 am
"Gutiérrez, Víctor Samuel c/ Estado Nacional" (Fallos 300:1092, 1978)Sentó principios fundamentales sobre la responsabilidad del Estado por actividad ilícita. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 4:17 am
In Train v. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 10:17 am
United States in 2024. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 1:03 pm
Category #7 turns to three modern presidents: Presidents Richard Nixon, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
In Part I, I revisit the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Youngstown Steel v. [read post]
