Search for: "Nixon v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 8:47 am
In its 1982 decision in Nixon v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:03 pm
United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
In each case, I will state my position briefly; repeat the critique; and where I can, rebut it. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 8:11 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 11:05 am
I ultimately did not answer this question, but said the question was open under Walter Nixon v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 8:00 am
” Ward v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 1:01 pm
The clause states: "Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
The Constitution specifies that when the President of the United States is tried, “the Chief Justice shall preside. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Title X was signed into law in 1970 by (Republican) President Nixon. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 3:47 am
In Bostock v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 9:00 pm
The relevant constitutional provision, in Section 2 of Article II, states that the President “shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 11:28 am
Justice Chase wrote in Calder v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am
The director will: [S]erve as the principal advisor to the President on cybersecurity policy and strategy relating to the coordination of [cyber defense, cyber-related diplomacy, understanding and deterring malicious cyber actors, and engaging with industry, among others] [§ 1752(A)] [O]ffer advice and consultation to the National Security Council and its staff, the Homeland Security Council and its staff, and relevant Federal departments and agencies, for their consideration relating to the… [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Harris’ tie-breaking vote) could decide this question for itself, and rely on the Nixon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 9:08 pm
In Nixon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:27 am
That settlement was achieved through popular constitutionalism rather than Article V, leaving the election challengers two diametrically opposite choices. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:31 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, Hoffa v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 12:38 pm
In Burdick v. [read post]
