Search for: "Nixon v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 1,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2018, 3:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
There has been much noise lately that President Trump ought not get a nominee on the Supreme Court while an investigation is in progress, or, if he does, that the nominee should recuse himself in any case of constitutional confrontation with the President on the order of United States v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 705–706 (1974); executive immunity, Nixon v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:30 am by Karen Tani
Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of sex.Section 2. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm by David Tanenhaus
If the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion on integrated schools and ignored Brown v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the Contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens under this Treaty, but the executive authority of each shall have the power to deliver them up, if, in its discretion, it be deemed proper to do so. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:20 am
Wade fell, highlighting the states where the Nixon-era American Girl doll Julie may have had more access to abortion in 1974 than we do today.... [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 4:57 am by Susan Brenner
 Additionally, the Court found Ocasio's request met the other requirements of Nixon and therefore was within the scope of Rule 17. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 6:52 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, 802 F.Supp. 490, 504 (D.D.C. 1992) vacated on other grounds by Hastings v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
Richard Nixon was so named in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica and defended by the United States in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 3:21 am
   This year's first day of the new term saw the re-argument of Sessions v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]