Search for: "Nixon v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2020, 4:39 pm
Citizen, 749 F.3d at 271 (quoting Nixon v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:54 pm
Nixon decision, which was a prelude to his Vance dissent.) [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:40 am
Based on the foregoing, Lindenwood’s factual allegations fail to support the element of proximate cause (see Levine v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, 256 AD2d at 149-150; Gersh v Nixon Peabody LLP, 2017 NY Slip Op 30363[U], 2017 NY Misc LEXIS 682, * 18-19 [Sup Ct, NY County 2017]; Caso v Sklarin, 2016 NY Misc LEXIS 6863, * 12-13 [Sup Ct, NY County May 26, 2016, No. 159192/2015]). [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Once this system takes hold, it forms a true equilibrium from which only oddball states (Maine and Nebraska) will depart. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm
Flynn filed a motion to compel certain material under Brady v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
(nominado por Richard Nixon). [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
” This chapter discusses the attacks on the rule of law by the President and some in his orbit, including: (i) the rule of law; (ii) criticisms of laws by the President; (iii) The Hatch Act; (iv) other examples of violations; (v) military law; and (vi) pardons. 12.2 Rule of Law The President of the United States takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:38 am
After Ford left the White House in 1977, he privately justified his pardon of Nixon by carrying in his wallet a portion of the text of Burdick v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of… [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:52 am
Circuit in Bluman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm
Last year, President Trump responded angrily to the Supreme Court’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
For example, in Triplett v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
8/5/1974: Shortly after the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:11 pm
Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
[After two days of hero worship for Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Gorsuch, day three dumps on the Junior Justice.] [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:17 pm
Madison); Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:10 am
Trump v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
In 1970, (Republican) President Nixon signed Title X into law, which led to the creation of federally funded family-planning clinics across the country. [read post]
