Search for: "Nixon v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 1,232
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 6:00 am
Plaintiff claimed that his religious faith mandates sexual intercourse with his spouse.In Nixon v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 2:59 am
After a series of court battles, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:21 am by David A. Moss
Note: In California, the ACLU has launched a campaign to get elected officials to enact sentencing reform as they strive to resolve the state's budget crisis and implement the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost maintains that “[p]olitical differences aside, a common-sense reading of Kavanaugh’s testimony shows that he is ready if confirmed to vote to overrule the abortion-rights decision Roe v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 10:33 am
Marion Superintendent Andrew Nixon said the board adopted a resolution several years ago stating members would not hear any expulsion cases. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:03 am by Michael Stern
  The PRA also addresses the constitutional concerns discussed by the Supreme Court in Nixon v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:28 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York 2012); State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am by Quinta Jurecic
That year, the Court handed down Hamdan v. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 4:09 pm
In the first part of its opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 11:30 am by STEPHEN HOLZER
  The first blow to EPA’s power came from the United States Supreme Court in Michigan v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 3:40 am
Campaign Comm., 533 U.S. 431 (2001), and Nixon v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Fingers crossed.But while we await developments in the Land of Lincoln, it's time to head back to the Lone Star State where the Court of Criminal Appeals, to the likely-surprise of nobody, issued its opinion this morning in State ex rel Lykos v. [read post]