Search for: "Nixon v. State" Results 301 - 320 of 1,225
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by Charlotte Butash
Though the committee cites the Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court currently has on its docket various cases pitting one or more states against the federal government, such as Pennsylvania v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union did not simply allow arbitrary actions by state actors—or not only that. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:13 am by Kalvis Golde
At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter looks to past precedent in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 9:45 am by Jonathan Shaub
” Similarly, while president, Thomas Jefferson responded to a House resolution requesting information about the conspiracy against the United States involving Aaron Burr by providing all information relevant to Burr but withholding other names. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:10 pm by NCC Staff
An Impeachment Trial Without Witnesses Would Be Unconstitutional By Paul Savoy, Former prosecutor, Manhattan District Attorney’s Office Paul Savoy contends that key legal precedents including Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Nixon v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
” Even staying on the bench when one’s state secedes from the Union. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:00 am by Bob Bauer
The House action was “purely partisan,” he stated, and a “partisan crusade. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
If Collins’s effort is successful and Schiff gets his way, Bolton has publicly stated that he will comply with a Senate subpoena for his testimony despite the White House’s claim that he is absolutely immune from such testimony. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The obstruction charge does include a statement that the charged actions were “consistent with President Trump’s previous efforts to undermine United States Government investigations into foreign interference in United States elections. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The second article of the House’s impeachment resolution charges President Trump with obstruction of Congress. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 5:46 am by Philip Bobbitt
There is a unanimous Supreme Court case on point—United States v. [read post]