Search for: "Nixon v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm
Cogan and Michael McConnell discuss the US Supreme Court amicus brief they filed, along with scholars Christopher DeMuth and Peter Wallison, in Biden v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:59 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:25 pm
[3] Jarkesy v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
Nixon, 263 N.C. [read post]
Constructive Ambiguity of the Budapest Memorandum at 28: Making Sense of the Controversial Agreement
7 Feb 2023, 5:31 am
” And they reaffirmed the positive and negative security assurances to all non-nuclear states under the NPT previously made by nuclear powers, including Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 10:53 am
Or more precisely, this argument echoes the position raised in Walter Nixon v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In caselaw, lawyers and historians can rely on new historical evidence to challenge previous rulings, as the Organization for Americans Historians did in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:57 am
Bic Corp., 851 F.2d 673, 678 (3d Cir. 1988) (citing Nixon v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
She is in her first year as a student at Myrontana State University (MSU), the state’s flagship campus. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
He argues that Clinton v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
That said, once the documentary evidence is in the trial record, it is ordinary accessible to the general public without any particularized showing of need, Nixon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
NLRB v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 9:05 pm
A state judge overturned Georgia’s ban on abortion after six weeks of pregnancy, ruling that it violated Roe v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
EPA and more in the concerns animating Justice Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 10:09 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 8:16 am
” Skolnick v. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 8:02 am
Largely lost in history is the fact that on October 17, 1972, President Richard Nixon vetoed the bill, citing the $24.6 billion it was estimated to cost to implement the CWA and based on Nixon’s stated desire to lower federal spending to curb inflation. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
