Search for: "Nixon v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 972
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am by Jack Goldsmith, Ben Miller-Gootnick
That clause states that only an “Officer” may succeed and act as president. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
  Georgia declared implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For example, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by Charlotte Butash
Though the committee cites the Supreme Court’s decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court currently has on its docket various cases pitting one or more states against the federal government, such as Pennsylvania v. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 6:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
That objection would be misplaced, because the same principles that the Court invokes in Imbler are also invoked in cases more clearly grounded in Article II, especially Nixon v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union did not simply allow arbitrary actions by state actors—or not only that. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
Editor's Note: This post contains the text of a speech that former Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson delivered on Feb. 6 at the American Constitution Society (ACS) Symposium at the Georgetown University Law Center. *** I am happy to be part of this symposium. [read post]