Search for: "Nixon v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 916
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2019, 3:57 am by Edith Roberts
At the Nixon Foundation blog, Jeffrey Morris notes that next week marks the 50th anniversary of President Richard Nixon’s appointment of Chief Justice Warren Burger, and he assesses Burger’s legacy. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:00 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Republicans like to blame the Warren Court for everything they don’t like but it was the Burger Court, with four Nixon appointees, that decided Roe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  And even if Steve Calabresi is correct, as discussed in an earlier post, that at present Democrats control six of the twelve smallest states, it is also demonstrably true that these states are increasingly unrepresentative of the rich pluralism and multi-culturalism that typify the larger states. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Red terror pushed the legitimised violence of the new state to the extremes. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:19 pm by Scott R. Anderson, Kathleen Claussen
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit—ultimately ruled in his favor in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Evan Caminker
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:48 am by John Floyd
United States once again cautioned that “Kilbourn v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am by Jack Goldsmith
The analysis is lengthy, so I will state my main conclusions here: None of the critics defends the report’s actual reasoning, which is pretty obviously flawed. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
” It was important for the House to enhance the judiciary committee’s subpoena powers in 1974 and 1998 because of the state of the chamber’s rules at the time. [read post]