Search for: "Nixon v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2024, 7:20 am
With this claim, Trump seeks to expand Nixon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
That argument is based on a line of civil cases establishing that presidents can’t be held liable via monetary damages for their official actions—more specifically, as the Supreme Court held in 1981 in Nixon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 7:32 am
Nixon resigned to avoid being impeached over the Watergate scandal. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 1:05 pm
In the 67-page motion, Trump argues for absolute immunity, citing Nixon v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
(Particularly following the Supreme Court’s 1983 decision in INS v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 6:40 pm
Nixon. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm
The textbook case on this issue is Harper & Row v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:01 am
Supreme Court in Tennessee Valley Authority v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:59 am
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Past practice--including in the Nixon tapes case and Bush v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 3:42 pm
In McDonnell v. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 1:27 pm
The opinion begins: Since the Supreme Court's decision in Nixon v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:24 am
When Reagan chose her in 1981, Rehnquist was already on the Court (appointed by Richard Nixon). [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am
” Japan said it has asked the United States to suspend all non-emergency V-22 Osprey flights over its region after one of the U.S. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
See Leser v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
As the Supreme Court wrote in Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am
Ruiz, Jr. was the first Hispanic attorney to argue before the United States Supreme Court in Buck v. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
” Examining the Harvard Law School’s compendium of Article 51 letters, it is clear that although a number of states had filed Article 51 letters in which they cited both state and non-state actor threats, relatively few states had exclusively cited non-state actor threats in Article 51 letters filed before 2001. [read post]
