Search for: "No. 95-1961"
Results 81 - 89
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2016, 7:10 am
Darren E. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
The reason this resonates is because it has been a trope appropriated in quite related and distinct ways by 20th century leaders (Fidel Castro Speech to Intellectuals 1961 ("This means that within the Revolution, everything goes; against the Revolution, nothing. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
Nevertheless, the OD dealt with the objection in substance […] by stating that claims 1 and 2 of auxiliary request II were not limited to a single plant variety and were therefore allowable under A 53(b) and R 23b(4) EPC 1973. [23] Under these circumstances the objection under A 100(a) in conjunction with A 53(b) against product claims relating to tomato fruits cannot be regarded as a fresh ground of opposition which may be introduced in the appeal proceedings only with the proprietor’s consent… [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
Prof. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
Earlier this week, I delivered a paper for Australia's CEO Challenge as part of Queensland's Domestic and Family Violence Prevention Month. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In 1958 alone, five works were published under his name, and then in 1960 and 1961 he published four different books for each of those respective years. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Supreme Court Rule 37 The Michigan Supreme Court promulgated Rule 37 in 1961, which was restated in General Court Rule (GCR) 1963, 516.5, as follows: “Judges of courts of record in which condemnation proceedings have been instituted shall advise the jury or commissioners on questions of law and admissibility of evidence. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Supreme Court Rule 37 The Michigan Supreme Court promulgated Rule 37 in 1961, which was restated in General Court Rule (GCR) 1963, 516.5, as follows: “Judges of courts of record in which condemnation proceedings have been instituted shall advise the jury or commissioners on questions of law and admissibility of evidence. [read post]
