Search for: "No. 99-1081" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2012, 9:38 pm by John L. Welch
SAS Optimhome, 99 USPQ2d 1959 (TTAB 2011) [precedential]. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
According to other decisions (T 314/99 [5.1 to 5.6]) or T 186/01 [4]), a document did not become publicly available by its mere arrival in the archive of a library. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:33 am by Katharyn Grant (US)
Old World Trading Co., 41 F.3d 1081, 1091 (7th Cir. 1994) (citing Accu-Sort Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
Delahaye Estate, 2003 BCSC 1081, 2 E.T.R. (3d) 107 [Ryan]. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:50 am by Diane Tweedlie
It is recognized in the case law of the boards of appeal that the requirement of substantiation under Rule 76 (2) c), point 3, "EPC" as well as the statement of the facts and evidence used for the reasoning "wants to achieve that the opponent's position in the Notice of opposition is set out so clearly that both the patent proprietor and the opposition division know what the opposition is about (T 228/85) and can check that it is justified; It does not matter whether the… [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
According to the case law of the boards of appeal, information is “available to the public” if only a single member of the public is in a position to gain access to it and understand it, and if said member of the public is under no obligation to maintain secrecy (see T 1081/01 [5], affirmed by T 1309/07 [3.2.1]). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
According to the case law of the boards of appeal, information is “available to the public” if only a single member of the public is in a position to gain access to it and understand it, and if said member of the public is under no obligation to maintain secrecy (see T 1081/01 [5], affirmed by T 1309/07, [3.2.1]). [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
CV-99-05183-MHP Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, BEEZER and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
[Bowies were regulated like other knives; knives were sometimes regulated like handguns] This post describes and analyzes nineteenth century state statutes on Bowie knives. [read post]