Search for: "Noll v. Noll"
Results 101 - 120
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2007, 10:00 pm
V; see also Maryland v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:00 pm
V; see also Maryland v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 8:07 am
Stevens v City of Columbus, OH, 2022 WL 2966396 (6th Cir. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 3:44 pm
Sleet, the State Attorney's Office filed a "Notice of Nolle Prosse" which dropped all charges against client including one count of organized scheme to defraud less than $20,000 and six counts of fraudulent use of credit card. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 2:15 am
He started filling out the nolle (dismissal) form, and I began to explain why my client was innocent. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:34 am
Yet, in Sosa v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:09 pm
So imagine my glee upon reading the (sadly unpublished) opinion in Miller v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 4:07 am
Burlette Carter revisits Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm
The second change, in 2014, came in the Supreme Judicial Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:45 am
The opinion is found at Wells v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:33 am
Later the state filed a nolle prosequi and Mr. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 12:41 pm
DJCIS, and again in its recent decision, Doe v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:36 am
Instead of trying to save face with a plea to something — anything — put on your big boy pants and nolle the case, or tell your supervisor that you think it should be nolled. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:53 am
State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:17 pm
There are provisions for early expungement for not-guilty, noll-prosequi, and deferred sentencing agreements. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 2:40 pm
That was just returned today by the jury in Cardin v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:52 pm
Virginia v. [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 8:06 am
While the Supreme Court debates obviousness in KSR v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:21 am
Following, are the specific conditions, outlined in the statutory language, that are associated with an accident surcharge, that if proven true, allow for a challenge and a reimbursement of the surcharge: (I) Lawfully parked; (II) Reimbursed by, or on behalf of, a person responsible for the accident or has a judgment against such person; (III) Struck in the rear by another vehicle headed in the same direction and was not convicted of a moving traffic violation in connection with the accident; (IV)… [read post]
