Search for: "Nollan v. California Coastal Commission"
Results 81 - 98
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
California Coastal Commission did not apply to the ordinance where the ordinance did not require Watson to dedicate any portion of his property to either the City's or the public's use. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 6:24 pm
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987). [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 12:19 pm
The California Coastal Commission said no. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 3:32 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:20 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:27 am
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 824 (1987). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:08 am
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987) and Dolan v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 11:55 pm
California Coastal Commission and the "rough proportionality" test of Dolan v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 2:51 am
California Coastal Comm'n, No. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:40 am
California Coastal Comm’n, 483 U.S. 825 (1987) (citations omitted). [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 5:08 pm
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825 (1987), and Dolan v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:21 pm
"This case presents an issue of first impression in this Circuit â€â [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 12:51 am
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S. 825, 837. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:56 pm
California Coastal Comm’n (1987) 483 U.S. 825; Dolan v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 1:28 pm
California Coastal Commission to be mostly wrong, after the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Lingle v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 1:27 am
California Coastal Commission, 483 U.S 825 (1987) (government demanded conveyance of a public easement across Nollan's land). [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:47 pm
Given that the excesses of the California Coastal Commission resulted in the Nollan case, that scenario isn't much of a stretch to imagine. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 6:56 am
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
