Search for: "Norman v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2010, 7:41 am by Meg Martin
Walck, Jr.Citation: 2010 WY 53Docket Number: S-09-0121Appeal from the District Court of Carbon County, the Honorable Norman E. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
An Analysis of Two Recent Communications from Australia, (University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol. 42, 2019).Norman I. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:16 am by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: TY ROUSH v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:19 pm by WSLL
The State of Wyoming, Dept. of Revenue Citation: 2009 WY 139 Docket Number: S-08-0098 W.R.A.P. 12.09(b) Certification from the District Court of Sublette County, Honorable Norman E. [read post]
We've been busy filing an appellate brief and drafting another, so until now, haven't had the chance to post up links about Tuesday's New York Court of Appeals oral argument in Kaur v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm by Anna Christensen
Wade, but maintaining that state-imposed twenty-four-hour waiting periods and biased counseling before a woman can have an abortion were invalid); and his dissents in Bowers v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am by WSLL
Summary of Decision issued March 23, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Ultra Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 10:47 am
 By way of contrast with the treatment of this issue in the United States, Norman takes a look at a very recent decision of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales in HTC Europe Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 451 (Kitchin, Richards and Lewison LLJ var’g [2012] EWHC 1789 (Pat) Floyd J). [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 6:03 am
Posted by John Mark Zeberkiewicz and Stephanie Norman, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., on Friday, April 13, 2018 Editor's Note: John Mark Zeberkiewicz is a Director and Stephanie Norman is an Associate at Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
 The Court explained, citing this paper by former Guest Kat, Professor Norman Siebrasse (see Norman's blog here), that this was a doctrine from a different era which was based on the view that no one wanted to second guess the Crown in its exercise of granting a patent. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:23 pm by WSLL
Affirmed.Case Name: ERIC LEVANTER DEMILLARD v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:48 am by WSLL
Case Name: DANIEL RAY BOWLSBY v. [read post]