Search for: "North Carolina v. Alford"
Results 41 - 60
of 75
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
(A discussion of recent decisions eliminating heartbalm actions in North Carolina and West Virginia is available here.) [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 1:35 pm
Broun, Brandis & Broun on North Carolina Evidence 921 (7th ed. 2011). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:47 am
Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:22 pm
Alford. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 8:20 am
Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm
” Further, New York recognizes so-called “Alford pleas” (North Carolina v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 4:44 am
The term “Alford plea” originated with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in North Carolina v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:36 am
They’ve done a study which shows that even innocent people will rationally choose to plead guilty to something they didn’t do in order to avoid greater punishment, something the Supreme Court recognized in North Carolina v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:04 am
An Alford Plea was recognized by the Supreme Court in the case of North Carolina v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm
The plea is named for the defendant in Alford v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:25 am
North Carolina v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 9:31 pm
McMurray, 09-5806 (Aug. 4, 2011), the court considered whether a factual basis proffer for purposes of a “best interest plea” under North Carolina v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
McIntyre Machinery Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:49 am
The term Alford plea comes from the 1970 US Supreme Court Case North Carolina v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:47 pm
Those cases are Alford v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:31 am
One of the interesting aspects of this criminal case is that her criminal defense lawyer convinced the prosecutor and judge to allow his client to plead guilty pursuant to a Supreme Court decision called North Carolina v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
North Carolina (09-11121) — right of juveniles being questioned at school to warnings under Miranda v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:42 pm
The North Carolina Supreme Court in J.B.D. emphasized in its ruling that the custody standard is objective. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:13 am
North Carolina (09-11121), the Court will be reviewing a North Carolina Supreme Court decision that courts are barred from considering age as a factor in the Miranda v. [read post]
