Search for: "North Carolina v. Butler"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
V. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
Strawn v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
For every amazing underdog success story, such as Butler, George Mason, and VCU, there are way more Kentuckys, North Carolinas, and Michigan States. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 7:18 am
Instead, it was a social security number belonging to a resident of North Carolina. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:33 pm
Butler v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 8:38 am
LEXIS 108822 (ED NC, Oct. 13, 2010), a North Carolina federal district court rejected a prisoner's claim that his rights under RLUIPA and the 1st Amendment were violated by prison authorities refusal of his requests to use certain ritual items and an outdoor worship circle in the practice of his Asatru religion.In Butler v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Thornburg of Asheville, N.C., who had declared the plants a “public nuisance” because of their effect on air quality in North Carolina’s scenic western mountains. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:56 pm
The federal appellate court also believed the state appellate court got the facts of Thompkins' interrogation wrong.The 6th Circuit relied on the prior and seminal SCOTUS decisions of Miranda v Arizona and North Carolina v Butler, which establish an accused individual's right to remain silent, and imposes a "heavy burden" on the state to demonstrate that a suspect, once advised of this right, has waived his privilege against… [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:19 am
The federal appellate court also believed the state appellate court got the facts of Thompkins' interrogation wrong.The 6th Circuit relied on the prior and seminal SCOTUS decisions of Miranda v Arizona and North Carolina v Butler, which establish an accused individual's right to remain silent, and imposes a "heavy burden" on the state to demonstrate that a suspect, once advised of this right, has waived his privilege against… [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 10:31 pm
The only way to bring some measure of sanity to runaway state judicial elections, is for states to push for publicly financed elections – an initiative that’s been tried with some success in North Carolina, and has been adopted in New Mexico, Wisconsin and most recently in West Virginia after Caperton. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm
Arguing on behalf of the state, Michigan Solicitor General Eric Restuccia began by emphasizing the Court’s decision in North Carolina v. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 3:53 pm
In North Carolina v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:22 am
"It's hard to believe that one or two women justices might not have made a difference," he told me from his home near the University of North Carolina, where he is a professor emeritus. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:01 am
" It thus rejected a bid by the University of North Carolina for reversal of a 1954 lower court order requiring "college officials to admit three black students to what was previously an all-white institution. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
Zaden v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 11:33 pm
Cullen issued his decision March 4, 2008. *** Case Farms of North Carolina, Inc. (11-CA-21378, 21379; 353 NLRB No. 26) Morganton, NC Sept. 30, 2008. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
Box 17541 Little Rock, AR 72222 Phone: (501) 671-6571 E-mail: markgeorge@att.net Web: http://www.dsff.org Up with Downs 2683 North 40th Street Springdale, AR 72762 Phone: (501) 751-8713 Easter Seals Easter Seals Arkansas 3920 Woodland Heights Road Little Rock, AR 72212 Phone: (501) 227-3600 E-mail: info@ar.easter-seals.org Web: http://ar.easter-seals.org Easter Seals Arkansas Adult Services Center 11801 Fairview Road Little Rock, AR 72212 Phone: (501) 221-8400 Easter Seals… [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Evan Brown posted a snippet of the Daily Show's wonderful explanation of the Viacom v. [read post]
