Search for: "North Dakota v. Howard" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2017, 12:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
” The North Dakota courts have not imposed a heightened duty on designated drivers by common law. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:04 pm by Andrew Hamm
North Dakota, which challenges laws that make it a crime for a driver suspected of drunk driving to refuse a chemical test to measure his blood-alcohol concentration. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am by Amy Howe
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses the Court’s summary opinion in James v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
North Dakota, and Beylund v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
North Dakota, in which the Court held that the Constitution allows warrantless breath tests – but not warrantless blood tests – of suspected drunk drivers, comes from Steve Shiffrin at Religious Left Law. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
But some states — when I last checked, Hawaii, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Dakota and Utah — still recognize the alienation of affections tort; and at least North Carolina still recognizes the criminal conversation tort. [read post]