Search for: "North Dakota v. Minnesota" Results 1 - 20 of 241
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2016, 6:06 am by Genaro Cortez
North Dakota and Minnesota take their DWI laws a step farther. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:06 am by Genaro Cortez
However, North Dakota and Minnesota take their DWI laws a step farther. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:32 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The materials in the Montrail County matter (Dakota Petroleum Transport Solutions LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:11 am by Ram Eachambadi
The case came to the Supreme Court through three unrelated cases in Minnesota and North Dakota. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:45 am by Andrew Hamm
North Dakota, Bernard v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 2:32 pm by Bradley McAllister
North Dakota [SCOTUSblog materials], consolidated with Bernard, William R. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:07 am by The Law Librarian
North Dakota, which the Court heard in a consolidation with two other cases, including Minnesota’s own Bernard v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:30 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Palmer v. 999 Quebec, Inc, a case from the Supreme Court of North Dakota, involved a plaintiff who was born in 1955 and was raised in Duluth, Minnesota. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 12:44 pm by Seth Jaffe
If you needed any further proof that energy law is very complicated, Wednesday’s decision in North Dakota v. [read post]
14 May 2016, 2:06 pm by John Floyd
Currently pending before the Supreme Court are consolidated cases from Minnesota and North Dakota—under the title of Birchfield v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 2:33 pm by Linda R. Evers
A North Dakota generation-and-transmission cooperative cannot ensure that the coal-generated electricity that it injects into the MISO grid is used only to serve its North Dakota members and not its Minnesota members. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm by CJLF Staff
  CJLF filed an amicus brief in one of the North Dakota cases, Beylund v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:00 pm
Coop., Inc., 354 N.W. 2d 666 (1984) (North Dakota law, not Minnesota, applied to claim stemming from injury due to conduct in North Dakota by a Minnesota-domiciled employee of a Minnesota employer). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 6:36 am
Coop., Inc., 354 N.W. 2d 666 (1984) (North Dakota law, not Minnesota, applied to claim stemming from injury due to conduct in North Dakota by a Minnesota-domiciled employee of a Minnesota employer). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:00 pm
Coop., Inc., 354 N.W. 2d 666 (1984) (North Dakota law, not Minnesota, applied to claim stemming from injury due to conduct in North Dakota by a Minnesota-domiciled employee of a Minnesota employer). [read post]