Search for: "North Dakota v. Thomas"
Results 61 - 80
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Here are some panels that may be of interest to readers:YOUNGBLOOD: YOUTH, RACE, AND THE STRUGGLE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS PRESIDING: Prudence Cumberbatch, Brooklyn College The Racial and Sexual Politics of Space: Youth and Interracial Mixing in New Orleans, Lakisha Michelle Simmons, Davidson College More than a Hamburger and a Cup of Coffee: NAACP Youth and the Black Freedom Movement, Thomas Bynum, Middle Tennessee State University Blackboard Jungle: Desegregation,… [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 8:19 am
District Court Judge Ralph Erickson drew this conclusion in 2021 after he threw out a federal death sentence against a North Dakota man, who was sentenced to the ultimate punishment based on Dr. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:24 am
North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298, 311 (1992). [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 5:00 pm
First, we omitted from the list Creighton, Missouri (KC), and Hawaii, each with only 11 students, and a host of schools that showed less than 10 part time students (Boston College, Drake, Florida Coastal, Memphis, Northern Illinois, Regent, Richmond and South Dakota), but left in Tulsa with 16. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
In 2021, merchant trade associations sued the Federal Reserve in the district court for the District of North Dakota, seeking review of the 2012 rule. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:04 am
North Dakota (06-564) was an attempt to take advantage of the Court's 2004 decision in Crawford v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
North Dakota Century Code section 17-04-06: the first step toward a level playing field for wind projects and rural landowners. 85 N.D. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 5:57 am
North Dakota, the leading case on physical presence and sales tax. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:20 am
North Dakota, 504 U. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
App. 1991) (“[a] hospital that utilizes an alleged defective product only in the course of its primary function of providing medical services is not subject to an action of strict liability where the professional services could not have been rendered without using the product”); North Miami General Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
For a case discussing the distinctions between these two types of warnings in detail, read Thomas v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
North Dakota, 14-1468 – challenge laws from Minnesota and North Dakota (respectively), which are among the thirteen states that make it a crime to refuse a test for blood-alcohol content. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:23 pm
North Dakota (2016), which tried to resolve the uncertainty created by McNeely by addressing how the Fourth Amendment applies to both blood draws and breath tests in light of the implied consent statutes that states have enacted. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 8:30 am
This term, Justice Clarence Thomas, in Buck v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:56 am
North Dakota, concluding a warrantless breath test can be administered as a ‘search incident to arrest’, but a blood test still generally requires a warrant. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
North America, Inc., 971 A.2d 1228 (Pa. 2009), but dismissed the appeal as improvidently granted after it turned out that the defendant was an intermediate seller, not a true manufacturer (that makes a difference in the Third Restatement, but it’s not important here).Finally, the Third Circuit got fed up with the issue remaining undecided, and after trying unsuccessfully to get the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to accept a certified question, took the metaphorical bull by the horns and… [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Thomas E. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:48 am
Thus, however obviously sensible it would be to join North Dakota and South Dakota together in "Dakota," that can't be done without the consent of each of the states (as well as Congress), and, of course, one cannot imagine circumstances where the Dakotas would decide that having two senators is better than the present four;2) the right, guaranteed in Article V, to each state to veto any change in the (indefensable) allocation of… [read post]
