Search for: "North Dakota v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2017, 8:06 pm
Problem 14 --David Schultz, The State of Democracy in North Dakota --Notes and Questions -- Shaun Bowler When Is It OK to Limit Direct Democracy C. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Bay Mills Indian Community, the United States Supreme Court held that the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”) did not implicitly or explicitly abrogate the common law doctrine of tribal sovereign immunity so as to allow a state to file a federal suit against an Indian tribe for illegal gambling activity taking place outside of Indian country. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 2:39 pm by Joseph Koncelik
 These states are subject to a separate preliminary injunction which was issued by the federal district court in North Dakota. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:26 pm by Unknown
United States (Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium; FTCA)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlMoyant v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm by John Rubin
The United States Supreme Court held long ago, in the 1902 case of Minder v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 12:22 am
Ready Pac said the products containing the apples were shipped to Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin and West Virginia. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:42 am
Fast forward to 1956, when North Carolina decided to deal with Brown v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 7:04 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/ Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Cari Rincker
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am by Florian Mueller
This is just my first post on legislative initiatives in multiple states concerning mobile app stores, so I've really just begun to research the topic and have a lot to learn.A couple of weeks ago, the North Dakota state senate voted against a bill that would have required Apple's App Store and the Google Play Store to allow app developers to use other payment in-app payment systems. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:12 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the United States’ press release: JOINT STATEMENT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AND THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR REGARDING STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE V. [read post]