Search for: "North Dakota v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2018, 2:39 pm by Joseph Koncelik
 These states are subject to a separate preliminary injunction which was issued by the federal district court in North Dakota. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  Recently, plans to build a corn milling plant in North Dakota have caused states governments to consider their role in protecting both state and national security. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm by John Rubin
The United States Supreme Court held long ago, in the 1902 case of Minder v. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 12:22 am
Ready Pac said the products containing the apples were shipped to Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Wisconsin and West Virginia. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 3:26 pm by Unknown
United States (Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium; FTCA)State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.htmlMoyant v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 7:42 am
Fast forward to 1956, when North Carolina decided to deal with Brown v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:25 pm by Daniel Barry
‎ [6] The United States and each of the following 34 states as amicus curiae in support of Oklahoma: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas,… [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am by Cari Rincker
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 7:04 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/ Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2020.htmlUnited States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  Those states were Alaska[1], Arizona[2], Idaho[3], Michigan[4], New York[5], North Dakota[6], and Utah[7]. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:12 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the United States’ press release: JOINT STATEMENT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY AND THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR REGARDING STANDING ROCK SIOUX TRIBE V. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am by Florian Mueller
This is just my first post on legislative initiatives in multiple states concerning mobile app stores, so I've really just begun to research the topic and have a lot to learn.A couple of weeks ago, the North Dakota state senate voted against a bill that would have required Apple's App Store and the Google Play Store to allow app developers to use other payment in-app payment systems. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 12:03 pm by Unknown
Traditional Village of Togiak (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Banishment) United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm by NARF
Patuxent Facility (Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html North Dakota v. [read post]